Maldita
would u rather choose a person who can give the world to you, or rather the person whom you are his/her world?
would u rather choose a person who can give the world to you, or rather the person whom you are his/her world?
cant understand,,,, you're using shift of point of views, what do u mean by "or rather the person whom you are his/her world?" i think the person you are referring to the first clause is the same as the person in the second clause., but i understand u,, u are in doubt, just choose the person who makes u happy, happiness means not only in a way that you are laughing with him,or,her,, it includes inspiration, presence and a lot more to be define,, just choose the person who makes you happy....
..i think she's refering 2 diff. persons..d 1 hu cud give her evrythin she wnted..or d 1 hu cnt live w/o her-
it serves no purpose ,choice is for privileged not for people errant from their tracks of life and who live and die in wanderings of love . i care for someone and its her choice to choose me ,if its otherwise i can do nothing else but to wander in despair...... peace
choice is for privileged not for people errant from their tracks of life and who live and die in wanderings of love
i dont understand ur point.. we all have choices and we have the right to choose.
example,, i love some one so much that i do not consider any other choice but to wait for her acceptance . that entitles me to live a life of despair and wanderings .however she has so many choices .and she is the privileged one that she can consider any one among them to be happy . i hope i am not confusing myself and you :)
What a philosophical query! I do face that kind of dilemma right now. One suitor of mine is ready to give me - the comforts of life, the privileges of a rich life, the luxuries of education abroad.But the big problem is HE'S A MUSLIM.That's against my christian principles.Another suitor promises only stability and neverending loyalty to me. He promises to be a devoted lover,a true and nurturing companion. But the big scenario is he's just from the middle class. See what I mean? It's gonna be hard decision on a woman's part.
i would choose the person that i mean the world 2 cuz some1 that would give u the world can take it away juss as fast. a person that u mean the world 2 will stay with if he wants 2 keep his world.
but i used 2 ask mself the same ? too but that is the answer i got
It doesn't matter. They are the same for me. If I was that person's world then they have already given that world to me and I him because he would also be my world.
I will prefer person whom i am her world because according to me its useless to discover the original world because our life is too short for discovering that , rather we should try and discover our own world and be happy with that
Never choose the person to whom u luv u.
always choose the person who likes u.
in this is world evry one has his choice to choose according to ur choice and wishes.
gotcha! hmmm.. maybe i'll choose the one who consider me "his world".. i can't afford to be given all the riches and wonders of this world yet mine's shattered for i can't be with the one who truly loves me..:)
I will pick one who needs me so much as to make me his/her world, because at the end, that's what love is, right?
Of course a person for whom I am his world because if I am his world, then I don't need the world. I would like to create a new world with him.
I will definately say the person to whom i am the world. But if I can get both then yupeeeeeeeee!
I guess your question will find answer in a popular saying - "Marry the person who loves you and not the one whom you love.."
what a good question....
i'll choose d people who is just visible outward n inward
I have always preferred to be the centre of the chosen's world. May seem selfish but I believe it is less complicated to be loved than to love.
I would chose the latter, what the point of them giving you the world if your not the most important thing to them?
Depends on what you want from your life , how you feel the happiness , by being with the one , you love , & want to be with him , or being with the one , who would make you feel the special one ...
choice is yours to make ...
I'd go with option B, but I think that it's better to have neither. If you are someone's whole world, without you they have nothing. I think it's better for 2 people to be a part of each other's worlds but to also have others in their life.
i'd choose a 2nd one. But D person who have both the person as one... is The lukiest one... :)
m a new blogger... plz follow my link and comment if u like it.
http://princessblog24.blogspot.in/2012/12/sow-shall-you-reap-different-story.html
I think it depends on your personality. Someone who gives you the world will give you epic and endless possibilities to move forward with your life, even while others may get left behind. Someone who thinks you are their world, might get you trapped and you will be in that situation for a seriously long time. But you will be happy with the one who appreciates you the most.
Sign In and add your reply! Or, Sign Up Now!